Spawnmasons
discussion / applicant-committee
Discussion over our thoughts on initiates and returning masons.
1
my eyes
1
4
1
1
2
1 2 3 1
2
1 1
anymore 
2
1
1 anymore 2
2 1 1
1 1
1 1
is in the lead though
1 5 1
2
7
7
1
3
[it] and the that thing 
1 4
1 2
3
1
1
3
1 1
idk in all honesty 
3
1 1 1 1 1
1 2 1
1 1
3
4
1 1
‼️
1
2 2 2
2
1
2 1
go when my smiblings seem to momentarily lose the ability to read upon entering this channel 5 
1 
1 1
1
1 1
i try my best 2 1
3
1
2
2
2
2
1 1
2
1 from me 1 1
1 1 6 2 2 1
1
1
2 1
(again, only in our current scenario in the message you're linking to there. take a look: https://discord.com/channels/343851086026637313/353423878137315329/797236853643804692 I was referring to the social pressure of everyone knowing how you voted. i agree that the pressure is still there if it's just one person, just a bit less maybe. i was willing to concede that to you & others, as a compromise. see https://discord.com/channels/343851086026637313/353423878137315329/797246361661079622 or https://discord.com/channels/343851086026637313/353423878137315329/797230715858321419
in other words:
• i don't like it ("it" = prodding in dms)
• that's a consistent position that i've held all the way through
• its less bad than a fully public vote, but it always was a compromise
• i'd rather not have it
on the other hand, your position seems inconsistent to me, because on the one hand there's the msg i linked to about how it sorta sucks when a vote fails and you can't explain why, and on the other hand you voted no with no explanation, and complained in here when prodded to say why. while that literally was a compromise in your favor, in favor of non-anonymous voting, in favor of "no more no-votes without explanation". same goes for zippie who did the exact same thing last time (see from here onwards https://discord.com/channels/343851086026637313/353423878137315329/814972352471105667) 1 1 1
1
yes and no is ascii 
1 1 1
1
1
️ 
1
1
1 2
1 1 1
1 If Fit and the masons never mentioned him I would have no clue he existed
2
4 1
5
️
1
1 3
1 1 1 1 2
1 1
1 1
we lowered the standards for approving worshipfuls right before they all became worshipful and if you've backpedaled away from that then fine, now we are in agreement 
get your eyes checkedwe lowered the standards for approving worshipfuls right before they all became worshipful
1
3. 010110 0101010 101001 0110101 0100101 001010 0110110 10101 01011 0101 10 1110110 0
4. April 6, 2021 the 'leijurv' incident
3. 010110 0101010 101001 0110101 0100101 001010 0110110 10101 01011 0101 10 1110110 0
4. April 6, 2021 the 'leijurv' incident 
1
1
1
5
1 1
more? 6 
3 2
1
1 2
1 2?????
2 1 1 
1 2 1
1
1 1 1
1 1 3
1 5 4 3 3
1 3 3 3
3
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1 3
1 1 1 1 
2 1 3
1
hi dec if youre reading this from the future, please dont take this personally 
1
1
1
1 1 2
2 from me due to lacking self confidense
4
2
3
1 1
1 1
2 2 4 1
Voting Nochacho is no joke
Voting Nochacho is no joke 1
1 1 1
Another emp builder if im not mistaken, based with him around the server a good couple months now, talented builder. Also good friends with rooster and probably a decent few others here
Another emp builder if im not mistaken, based with him around the server a good couple months now, talented builder. Also good friends with rooster and probably a decent few others here 
Another emp builder if im not mistaken, based with him around the server a good couple months now, talented builder. Also good friends with rooster and probably a decent few others here 
♂️
Aholic, Elon, and Slappn were trolls not serious, i love thoss dudes but was responding to le vc
Aholic, Elon, and Slappn were trolls not serious, i love thoss dudes but was responding to le vc 
3
1
4
Doc back 
7 1
1
1 3 2 2
you
1 7
1
3
3 on all of them. 1 
️ BIG PLAYER ️ 
️ SLAVE ️ role
1
)
7
8
2
1
2
and then , got it? and then , got it? 
){kind=link}
